28 Eylül 2012 Cuma

JAMAICA: " THE RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS WITHIN THE POLICE FORCE IS ALMOST NONEXISTENT"

To contact us Click HERE


That Jamaica can be a violent place goes without saying.  What also goes without saying that amongst the top perpetrators of violence on the island is the police.

Recently, for example, Kayon Lamont, a 27 year old pregnant woman, who in the eighth month of said pregnancy was shot in the head by Constable Dwayne Smart after resisting arrest which resulted from the Constable citing her for the use of an expletive. 

Execution for cussing, that's a new one.

Some people actually defended the police saying Jamaicans needed to learn how to follow instructions from authorities.  That's not a new one, but it is a  good one.  Cops all over the world will tell you that.

Jamaica has a population of less then three million people.  Police on the island kill hundreds of people every year...well more then 1200 since 2007 alone. That's a lot of people being shot for not following instructions.

A lot of folks blame drugs and gangs.  Okay, I can buy that drugs and gangs are a big problem on the island, but  let's get real and include the police as just one more of the gangs. 

Yet, in gang shootouts all sides usually take losses.  Oddly, the police almost never suffer any wounded or dead.  Hmmm...are they THAT good at their job...are they that straight of shooters, or could it be the result of something else?  I wonder. 

A fellow named Fabian Lewis who happens to be   an intern columnist writes:


 Almost every night on television there is a reported shooting by the police under questionable circumstances. It’s a given that there will be two competing narratives, one given by the police that says it’s a shootout and the other by the residents claiming it to be murder in cold blood. In many cases the narrative you’ll believe is determined by where you are, or your standpoint on such matters. Be that as it may, what is all too overwhelming is evidence available to the public to confirm that the police are lying, and that the residents are indeed telling the truth.


These (the police)  are the people who are sworn to protect us, and are paid ironically by the very people who they shoot like sitting birds on an open range. It has now reached the point where the citizenry are more afraid of the police than the gunmen. There is absolutely no way one can live in a civilised society with that amount of fear of those that are sworn to protect you. Where has this culture of shooting then asking question later, and the impunity by which its carried out, come from? I say the government!

Mr. Lewis sums it up this way:


The belief within the police force that they can get away with anything, which is backed up by the low levels of cops charged and the lower number of those convicted doesn't help either. These acts all add up to the current state of affairs. The respect for human rights within the police force is almost nonexistent.

I could not have said it better.

What is even more scary about this story is that you can transfer it to many other Caribbean Island nations.

The following is from  Stabroek News.



Violence and the state in the Caribbean: Breaking the silence, connecting the dots


By Honor Ford-Smith
Honor Ford-Smith teaches in the Faculty of Environmental Studies at York University in Canada. She has worked in the Caribbean women’s movement, primarily through her involvement in collaborative theatre in Jamaica.
Earlier this year, after a public outcry against police killings in Jamaica, the newly elected Minister of National Security, Peter Bunting, issued a statement assuring the public that the new Jamaican administration will be holding the Commissioner of Police, and the High Command, accountable for a reduction in the level of fatal shootings by the police.  A few weeks ago, a policeman shot and killed Kayann Lamont in St Thomas.  She was eight months pregnant. Her death makes clear the fact that the excessive violence of state forces, whether colonial or contemporary, is alive and at our heels.  Kayann’s death reminds us of the words of the Minister of Security and the fact that it is only our actions that can hold state officials to their word.
It is now over two years since police invaded the West Kingston neighbourhood Tivoli in search of Christopher ‘Dudus‘ Coke, who was wanted by the Americans for trafficking narcotics and firearms.  In spite of the fact that Coke is now in prison, the names of those killed during the invasion have not been released to the public.  The official death toll in Jamaica is put at 72, but this has been widely challenged.  The Jamaica Labour Party government lost the last election in part because of the way it handled the extradition, but the state has still failed to account for the killings in Tivoli or answer the questions asked about the summary executions of people who never had a chance to prove whether they were fighting the state or not.  Since the Tivoli incursion was carried out by a state claiming it was acting on behalf of Jamaicans, we need to know what took place and who was killed in our name and why. For all of us, this lack of accountability indicates that citizens are considered disposable bodies.
It is not just Jamaica that faces a crisis around state violence and accountability.  Just last week in Guyana, residents protested the death of Shaquille Grant, fatally shot by the police on the eve of his 18th birthday.  At the end of last year, the Minister of National Security in Trinidad and Tobago issued a statement which frighteningly threatened citizens with unprecedented levels of state violence accompanied by sophisticated forms of surveillance.
Lack of accountability was at the root of the formation of Caribbean societies in colonial conquest. In spite of continued struggles to change this, the casual brutality that marked the region’s formation repeats itself again and again.  More importantly it repeats itself unequally, paid for repeatedly with the blood of working class citizens – a testament to the fact that the project of our emancipation is still incomplete, as novelist Erna Brodber puts it so eloquently.
What prevents full discussion of the possibilities and pain of state violence and what allows the police to kill with impunity, is the fact that many citizens are afraid to speak out and afraid to speak out together.  This silence threatens all of us because it enables violence to become a form of government.  Power and violence are opposites; where the one rules absolutely, the other is absent, philosopher Hannah Arendt once warned.  She reminds us that power is the concerted exercise of collective will, and can be an antidote to violence. While many propose that violence is the ultimate demonstration of power, violence can be a response to the loss of power or fear of weakness. Reversing this requires creating the solidarity among those who oppose violence and injustice.
Perhaps one place where this solidarity has tentatively emerged is in the vigils for the dead in Jamaica and elsewhere. On June 22, 2012 a crowd of about 500 kept a vigil in memory of Kavorne Shew, who died from a police bullet in Kingston, Jamaica on the morning of June 2, 2012. These enactments have become a way to assert community engagement and togetherness.
Wearing white T-shirts and carrying candles, the mourners comprising people from all sectors of Jamaican society, made its way slowly up the main road.   Turning off into the Mountain View community, the procession stretched dramatically across several slopes, coming to a halt outside Kavorne’s home. Candles burning in the darkness, the crowd sang spirituals like Satan, gimme pass.  A preacher called for calm and asked that no one seek revenge.   There was no castigation of the police, only the dignified voices of mourners singing choruses and calling for divine attention to pain and loss.
Kavorne Shew, who was 25 years old, had played a role in activities leading to peace in Mountain View, where the murder rate was lowered from 40 in one year to 2 in more recent times.  Similarly to the late Shaquille Grant in Guyana, who according to family members was waiting for his 18th birthday to apply to the army, and who had participated in a Citizen Security training programme, Kavorne had applied to join the police force and was to be baptized later that month.  He had participated in a training initiative for inner city youth aimed at increasing their employability.  The police explanation regurgitated a familiar script that nearly every Jamaican knows by heart:  Police on patrol entered a community and encountered men acting suspiciously. Gunmen opened fire on them.  The police were forced to return fire resulting in ‘x’ persons losing their lives.
The vigil for Kavorne Shew’s death is far from unique.  A few weeks ago, 1500 people turned out for a vigil for Kayann Lamont, the most recent victim of police violence. Since the 1990s Rastafari have kept a vigil to commemorate the Coral Gardens Massacre, one of the landmark acts of violence of the newly independent state against its citizens. In 1963, less than a year after the British flag was lowered, the state let loose on the Rastafari community of Coral Gardens in northwestern Jamaica in retaliation for the actions of 5 people involved in a land dispute. More than 150 people were arrested, tortured and jailed and an unknown number of Rastafari were killed. At the annual vigil elders testify, there is drumming and poetry. Through these performed memories the community calls on the state to issue a formal apology and to offer reparations as an act of restitution to the families scarred by the event.
At vigils for the murdered, communities enact their own memories of loved ones, and over dead bodies, assert the solidarity needed to generate the life giving bonds of love and support. Folks gather around images of the dead pasted on cardboard, tied onto people or mounted on fences surrounded by candles in plastic bottle tops.  They wear special colours or T-shirts adorned with the faces of the dead. The performance is captured in photographs and videos, to be replayed again and again.
Since 2002 Monica Williams has kept a vigil for her son Jason Smith, shot to death by police in Spanish Town.  Jason was 15.  According to Yvonne Sobers from Families against State Terrorism, an activist group that supports grieving families, Williams is one of several Jamaican parents who live with the memory of an innocent family member shot to death by the very forces responsible for guarding his safety.  Williams, supported by Jamaicans for Justice, has pursued her quest for justice in the death of her son even after a Home Circuit Court jury returned a not guilty verdict in 2005. She has bravely spoken out publicly about what happened remarking to the country’s major newspaper The Daily Gleaner:
“The only thing they found on my son was two packs of banana chips and a bottle of spring water. None o’ dem (police) can’t say them find any gun on him. I cannot see how all o’ this can gwaan and them get off free and still working in the force.”
Williams filed a suit in the Supreme Court against the attorney general and the three policemen involved in the incident and the courts ruled in her favour. She is awaiting the settlement.  In memory of her son Jason, she drives a blue car with his image on it, painted by an artist from the community.
Public attitudes to police violence are complicated by rising rates of gun violence and other forms of sexual and domestic community violence. A frightened public caught between gunmen and police violence remains silent and often condones police actions. “Dem should just drop a bomb on di whole a dem place deh,” one man remarked to me.  “Mi no have no sympathy fi none a dem man deh.” When I ask why, he describes how his daughter accidentally drove into a shoot out between gunmen.  “Dem mash up her life,” he concludes, evoking the powerlessness he feels as a father who was unable to protect his child.  Stories like this abound as do tales of police excess and corruption.
In 2010 police shot and killed 385 people in Jamaica. This year’s victims include Diane Gordon, a 45 year old office attendant shot by police in Cassava Piece, a small working class community in the middle of affluent Kingston. Vanessa Kirkland was 16 years old, one of 9 children, the only one to attend one of Kingston’s top ranking Catholic girls schools.  In March she was with friends, heading for a birthday party for friends when police stopped the car she was in, shot her dead and injured three others.
About 111 police killings were reported for the first 6 months of 2012, taxing the energies of peace and human rights organizations in the island. According to Susan Goffe, spokesperson for Jamaicans for Justice, a citizen’s action group that advances the claims of victims of police killings, “We have a serious problem with extra judicial killings.  It is our contention that police are able to commit murder with impunity.  They are able to do so because of the tacit approval of the wider society who fear the violence in the society and who do not want to undermine the police. We accept that police may be justified in using lethal force in certain situations. But we also maintain that our systems for determining what is justified and what is not are deeply problematic. We do not accept that the police act with impunity. We hold them accountable for all such uses.”
The litigation and the formal protests, the statements which are issued again and again by the Jamaican Coalition for Civil Society and organizations like Jamaicans for Justice are the formal face of the constant pressure for accountability.  The vigils are informal statements that the community is watching. Their significance is not just that they support the families and mourners.  They are enactments that transform the pain of violence from an isolated individual trauma to a shared experience. They make vivid the fact that bodies of Caribbean people are not disposable like waste.   They are one way to speak back to fear and isolation. And speak back we must from local sites to national, regional, diasporic places and beyond.

CHICAGO TEACHERS STRIKE AGAINST THE EMPIRE

To contact us Click HERE


I've been trying to find a way to post something about the teachers strike in Chicago that isn't just a rehash of today's news or some organizations rhetorical analysis.  I think I found something at the website of Solidarity, a socialist, feminist, anti-racist organization.  It asks the question, why the attack on public education in the first place, and it proceeds to give a pretty well thought out answer.  It goes beyond Chicago, but includes Chicago.  It goes beyond unions, but includes unions.  It goes beyond pedagogy, but includes pedagogy.  What it does best of all is show how what is happening in Chicago today is related to capitalism, to global capital, and really to the Empire.  It gives some thought to how the multitude can wage a struggle and how working people today can try to fight back.  I think you should read this.  I could have saved it for Theoretical Weekends, I suppose, but really it is today's news...and tomorrows.

The teachers strike in Chicago is no small matter.



What's behind the attack on teachers and public education?


by Peter Brogan

Editor's Introduction: On September 9, 2012, a day before the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) went on strike, Peter Brogan gave a talk in Chicago on the political and economic reasons underlying the attacks on public education and teachers in the United States. The following is an edited transcription of his talk.




Listen to this talk on YouTube
Some of the question I want to address today include: Why is Rahm Emanuel attacking the Chicago Teachers Union? Why is it so important for Emanuel and his supporters to break the CTU at this moment? Why are attacks on teachers and their unions at the center of both the Democratic and Republican Party’s political agenda? Why are both parties in such staunch agreement on the "education reform" agenda, which is fundamentally about dismantling the institution of public education, replacing it with a hybrid, largely privatized and corporate form? Why is the attack on public education so fundamental, not just for the right wing, but actually for the broader ruling class, in this country and globally?


Hence the fieldwork that I’ve been doing in Chicago is part of a comparative study of Chicago and New York that looks at transformations in urban space and capitalism, and is really trying to understand the problem of why the dismantling of public education and the creation of a privatized, corporatized education is really central to the larger transformations in the global political economy.



CTU members march through Chicago's center city on the first day of the strike



Part of the answer is understanding that political and economic elites, from former Mayor Richard M. Daley and the Commercial Club of Chicago to current Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Oregon-based Stand for Children, are fighting to produce the city in a particular way. This has been outlined in numerous planning documents from different city administrations, some of which have been drafted by the Commercial Club and have at the center an urban development strategy based on revitalizing the downtown core and prioritizing the financial, real estate and tourist sectors of the economy while at the same time demolishing public housing and schools in order to gentrify historically African American and Latino working class neighborhoods. These transformations are deeply related to the larger structural crisis of capitalism. The background to this is the crisis of profitability that comes to a head in the early 1970s, and the ushering in a period of capitalist regulation known as neoliberalism, marked by savage attacks on unions, workers and working class living standards. Reconstructing the built environment of the city has been absolutely central to all of these changes. This is one attempt to deal with the structural crisis of capitalism at this critical juncture. And destroying unions, and teachers’ unions in particular, have been key to that attempt.


A Global Attack



For the past twenty or thirty years, teachers have been under attack. From 1988 on, it’s been framed at the federal level as a “crisis of national security” but has also been at the heart of what has been understood as an "urban crisis." I believe that just as this attack on teacher unions is so central for the ruling class, at the same time teachers and public education are a vital sector for socialist transformation. And recognizing this, we need to see that organizing amongst education workers is not just like organizing other workers in either the public or private sectors, because I think there is a tendency on the labor left to see it as just another economistic fight. I think a major value of what the CTU under the leadership of CORE is doing is showing us a different way to think about the struggle amongst teachers and in public education, which takes both a class perspective and an antiracisit perspective. If we have any hope of pushing back the neoliberal attack on public education, on teachers and on unions, we actually need to frame it as a much broader struggle for social justice, not just wages, benefits and so on (though that is important for the life of schools and society).


The wider restructuring began in the Global South, starting with General Pinochet in Chile, in South Africa, and other countries from the 1970’s on. But I want to focus on how it has materialized on the ground here in Chicago. For the past seventeen years, at least since 1995 with the reforms under Daley and the creation of mayoral control of the Board of Education, we see this layering of "innovative" neoliberal policy in the city on top of an earlier set of genuinely democratic principles of innovation in how the school system was governed (e.g. more community direction of the schools through Local School Councils), which has really undermined any democratic notion of public control of the schools. These changes have been driven by two chief things: capitalist accumulation and the desire to expand into the public education sector, but also white supremacy and the restructuring of state power to manage poor Black and Brown people in the city in a manner that most benefits the political and economic power structure of "global Chicago." This is a fundamental dimension of the larger structural crisis of capitalism: how do you deal with a kind of surplus humanity? It’s not just keeping wages down anymore but it is actually something that is a real political problem for the ruling class. So I think the destruction of public housing, and public schools even more so, has been key to that.


As an arena of economic investment and capital accumulation the global market for educational services is tremendous! Two and a half trillion dollars globally as of last year, and in the U.S. it’s close to $600 billion that they’re looking to get their hands on. This is why what have been called “venture philanthropists”, most prominently the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Eli and Edyth Broad Foundation and the Walton Foundation have been the chief financial backers of the "school choice," so-called "education reform" movement. Education needs to be recognized as a vital arena for economic development and capitalist accumulation. The World Bank has been saying, at least since 1997, that there are no good jobs being created around the world. They’re mostly low-wage service sector jobs.


So if that’s the case, they say, why are governments around the world spending the bulk of money in education on professional, well educated teachers? Most money spent on education, especially in the U.S., goes to pay teachers, which is a good thing because they’re the most important facet of the system. But there's also that recognition that the labor market globally, and in the U.S. particularly, has been restructured in such a way around this kind of service sector, with very little manufacturing work, especially in a global city like Chicago which is really based on a service/knowledge sector economy. There is going to be a need to create educational opportunities for some folks to actually rise into those knowledge creative industries, but by and large most people are being trained for shitty service-sector employment. That kind of larger economic imperative beyond making more and more money in the education industry and creating those kinds of business opportunities is one of the central drivers of the attacks on teachers.

Social Struggles in the Global City



The second piece I want to say about what else is driving the attacks is the concept of the “Global City”. People like Rahm Emanuel here in Chicago and Mayor Mike Bloomberg in New York use the term “global city” all the time, but in a kind of boosterist way. “We’re gonna get the Olympics, we’re gonna bring NATO into town, to really show how cosmopolitan we are.” And that’s not the kind of meaning I’m trying to use when I say global city.


The transformation that have taken place with in the contemporary capitalist economy since the 1970’s means that some cities have been pushed to the center (Tokyo, London, LA, Chicago, New York) and others are on the margins. And Saskia Sassen and others have noted that you have cities that are financial nerve centers, power centers of global capitalism, in which you have the most vital and important financial markets but also where transnational corporations are located, making decisions and the like. Because of that, urban scholars have understood cities like Chicago and New York as places where experiments in the restructuring governance have occurred: pushing a corporate-private-entrepreneurial model in how we govern education, how we govern housing, injecting competitiveness into everything and standardizing everything. This raises the question that if on the one hand a global city like Chicago, as a nerve center of global capitalism, has such importance to the ruling class to restructure policies and so on, might it also have significance for a working class struggle?


Looking at the local newspapers here in Chicago over the course of the past few weeks it has been amazing to see such prominent coverage of the CTU and its negotiations with the city, with at least a dozen front page stories dealing with aspects of the fight between the two sides. Even The Wall Street Journal is saying that what is happening right now in Chicago is of historical, national significance. And they’re right. No other union in the country is pushing back and organizing like the CTU is doing right now. Even in a small way, if the CTU is able to push back against the advancing agenda of corporatizing and demolishing public schools, I bet it will have a huge effect nationally and globally against the project of neoliberalism in education. But more to the point, how a city is physically and socially built, what a city is for, whether we want a city for people or for profit will be the central issue in this struggle. You see that in a lot of materials being put out by the CTU: this isn’t just a fight over the school system itself, but what kind of city we want to live in, what kind of city we want to build. CTU has amazing researchers who have actually mapped out how foreclosures are related to gentrification patterns and the closing of the schools. They have an explicit, spatial-geographical way of understanding these radical changes.


The other piece I want to address is concerned with begins with the acknowledgement that teachers are the best organized, most highly unionized workers in the United States and globally. For example, there are five million workers organized between the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT)! Teachers unions, organizationally, are this huge potential roadblock, not just in preventing the steamrolling of public education and privatizing the whole system, but actually in the global city where the contradictions of capitalism, inequality and racial oppression are most intense. In Chicago, you can really feel that if you explore the different neighborhoods across the city. For the neoliberal project, you have to destroy any potential opposition. I think the teachers’ unions themselves, even while the bulk of them are collaborative and business-oriented--the NEA and AFT at a national scale most especially--and don’t have any interest in doing what CTU has done in mobilizing their membership, much less building a broader struggle for social transformation, still pose a huge potential political opposition to a resurgent neoliberalism that has been rebounding since the Great Recession of 2008.

The Politics of Pedagogy



There are great economic imperatives to why the ruling class in U.S. and around the world is attacking teachers and trying to restructure public education, but there is this political piece, especially in large cities like New York and Chicago, that is crucially important for us to take note of if we are to help turn the tide against capitalist austerity. Attached to that (and as a revolutionary socialist left we don’t say this enough) is that teaching is ideological, cultural work. Schools in most capitalist formations have played a role in what Althusser called an ideological state apparatus, reproducing capitalist hegemonic social relations, dominant class values and so on, that’s true.


But if we turn to someone like Gramsci, he notes that schools have also served as sites for radical contestation of all those things! That possibility exists in a public system where it won’t exist in a private system. So while it’s true (and as Marxists and socialists we need to say this) schools do, in many instances, play very oppressive roles in reproducing inequitable relations of capitalism. There is nothing inevitable about the role they play or the kind of work that teachers do in them. But also, it is important to acknowledge that when schools are public they at least hold that hope of educating democratic, critical subjects. Historically, schooling in the United State has been a completely racialized, gendered, and geographically uneven process and project. So you look at the work of someone like Diane Ravitch who was a leading proponent of neoliberal education reform, and wrote books blasting leftists the very same critique I just raised above, and who has now become a powerfully articulate and popular critic of what’s happening now in education you will see that she has this notion that there was a “golden age” in America where you could get a great education. And she did. And some people did: if you were white, if you lived in a middle class neighborhood. But historically it has been very inequitable.


In terms of recognizing the real subversive role that teachers can play, to get a sense of the wider injustice of capitalism, to give students the tools to understand the world and also begin to engage in activity to contest it in the school and outside, that’s another political piece that we need to really discuss. As we engage in building a movement for education justice that more effectively pushes back against the destruction of public schooling, we need to not just defend public schools but begin with a deeper recognition of the deep problems within the system and to advance a more radical analysis and movement around what’s being taught and how we are organizing our schools and classrooms, so that we don’t fall into this trap of just defending liberal education as the “great leveler” of American meritocracy. That has played a huge ideological role in containing working class struggle, this idea that you just advance up the ladder through education. But even if we all have equitable access to education (which we need to fight for) it will still not change the underlying reality of capitalism. We need to be fighting for a critical education for freedom.


Peter Brogan is a PhD candidate in the Geography Department at York University in Toronto and a member of CUPE Local 3903, the union that represents teaching assistants, graduate/research assistants and contract faculty.



EXODUS AND THE ISRAELI TREATMENT OF ERITREAN REFUGEES

To contact us Click HERE
TRAPPED AT THE BORDER

Remember the movie  EXODUS.  It was about a ship of Jewish refugees trying to make it into British controlled Palestine seeking refuge.  The British did all they could to keep the refugees out.  Eventually, the story turned into to a romanticized view of the birth of the Israeli state and of zionism.

Time for a new movie.

Anyway, fast forward to an Israel today which does all it can to turn back African refugees seeking asylum at the border and when that doesn't work making life as miserable as possible for the asylum seekers....all in violation of international law.

Just a few days ago about 20 Eritrean asylum seekers were stuck and starved in a no man's land between Israel and Egypt, between the border fences.  Eventually according to authorities in Israel the refugees agreed to go back to Egypt.  What really happened was that the Eritreans were teargassed and forced with metal rods toward the Egyptian border where the border guards said they didn't want the men, but they would take the women...and rape them (ah, in some places the Israeli Jewish State and the Egyptian Muslim can find a place to cooperate).  Eventually, the Israeli's decided to take the women and "send the men away."

Israel itself never bothered to officially find out what happened to the migrants who were "sent away."  The High Court of Israel ruled against a petition filed by We Are /refugees to find out what happened to the refugees.


From +972 comes the following:



Israeli officials suggested to the press that the 18 men weren’t interested in asylum, only in work, and suggested that they “agreed” to turn themselves over to the Egyptian army. The affidavits of the three detainees, taken separately at the Saharonim detention compound and released to +972 by “We Are Refugees” attorneys, tell a very different story. The fate of the 18 men forcibly returned to the Egyptians remains unknown, and the Prime Minister’s Office has been denying request for comments on their situation and whereabouts. 


V: 
…And then they moved us to the Israeli-Egyptian border, we stayed there for eight days, the hunger and thirst were horrible, the Israelis shot gas at us twice, they shoved a long iron rod through the fence and tried pushing us away. [On the 8th day] the Israeli crossed over and pulled B., N., and me through the fence and threw the other men onto a tarp and dragged them underneath the Egyptian fence. The men had been begging for eight days and on the eighth day they didn’t have any strength to resist, they were fainting and screaming “kill me right here.”



N. 
After what we went through everything that B. told you, me and another man were the first to get to the fence. Shooting started from both sides and we started digging. The Israeli soldiers took a long piece of iron and tried pushing us away through the holes in the fence. After we tried breaking through the fence they gassed us. We held onto the fence and wouldn’t let go. When I saw them mending and closing the fence again I fainted. The Israeli soldiers gave me an infusion through the fence. Every day the Israelis said “go to your country” and the Egyptians said we’ll take the women, we don’t want the men, and indicated with their rifles that they’d rape us and spoke about the two women they’ve been raping until now. We begged the Israelis and they said we’ll take the women and let the men go back. The men said we’d rather die here than go back. The Israelis crossed the fence to our side, we scattered in fear and the Israeli soldiers lifted the fence on the Egyptian side, grabbed the men and forcefully shoved them under the fence, to the Egyptian side. The men resisted and screamed, kill us right here, but to no avail. Then they took me, B. and V. to the Israeli side.



B. 
And then we saw the fence and right away the Israeli army showed up and told us in Arabic to go back to Egypt, fired into the air and tried driving us off with an iron rod and the Egyptian soldiers said don’t come back. After two days the men tried breaking through the fence and they shot tear gas at us, our eyes burned, we started crying and begging, please save us. A general with rank insignia showed up, a car came and fixed the fence, N. fainted, they started welding the fence and it became hot and the people who were holding onto the fence had their hands burned every day they told us go to Egypt…  The Israelis heard the Egyptians threaten us women and so on Thursday, the Israelis came and said you [men] go and we’ll take the women because we fear the Egyptians will rape them, the “ranks” [officer - D.R.] said women go in and you men go, and the men said, we’ll die, take us in as well. So they started talking at them through a bullhorn, called me because I speak Arabic and D., who speaks English, and said, the men go back, the women go in. The Israelis cut the fence and crossed to our side, and told the Egyptians, come and get them, but the Egyptians wouldn’t come, so we stayed on their side. A lot of the men were unconscious, we crawled in and I saw the others go back and the Egyptian soldiers waiting. We were taken, N. was unconscious, they lifted her and took us to be checked in a military place and then we got to Saharonim.



Holy shit!

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz wrote in an opinion piece:


This shameful incident cannot be allowed to pass quietly. The authorities must immediately launch a probe into who gave the order to treat the migrants this way - in violation of international refugee law and the international conventions Israel has signed - and punish the guilty parties. The way the High Court of Justice evaded hearing the case - first by postponing the hearing for three days, then by deciding that the issue had become moot - is also very disturbing.

In its treatment of migrants from Africa, Israel is gradually degenerating toward committing crimes against humanity. According to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, such crimes include broad or systematic assaults on a civilian population. The brutal expulsion of 18 Eritreans doesn't meet this definition, but the interior minister's plan to jail tens of thousands of migrants without trial for three years or more might very well be such a crime. The state must stop this degeneration immediately.


It is bad at the border.

Guess what...it doesn't stop there.

The following is from +972.



Mistreatment of refugees not limited to border


Although the recent incident on Israel’s southern border involving Eritrean asylum seekers received international attention, structural violence against African refugees has been going on for over five years now. It is important to remember that those who make it in face enormous difficulties due to state policies.Earlier this month, 21 Eritrean asylum seekers, including a 14-year-old child and two women, spent over a week trapped between fences on the Israeli side of the Israeli-Egyptian border. As the temperatures soared, the group was not provided with any shelter; the “most moral army in the world” gave the refugees only small amounts of water and scraps of cloth to protect themselves from the sun.Soldiers did not give them food and turned away the activists who tried to bring the asylum seekers something to eat.After the two women and the child were let into Israel – where they were taken to prison – and the men were returned to Egypt, reports surfaced that the army behaved violently towards these refugees. According to the three who entered, soldiers shot tear gas at the group and used an iron pole in an attempt to push them back to Egypt. The 18 men who were returned to Egypt were returned by force.International law prohibits states from forcibly returning asylum seekers to countries where their lives or liberty might be in danger, as does the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention, to which Israel is a signatory.While this was a dramatic example of the Israeli army’s treatment of the refugees, African refugees in Israel have faced the state’s structural violence and an increasingly hostile public for over six years.Although small numbers of African asylum seekers have been coming to Israel since the 1980s, a tremendous majority of the 60,000 refugees who are here now have arrived since 2005. More than 80 per cent are from war-torn Sudan or Eritrea, which are gripped by brutal dictatorships. After they enter the country, usually via the Egyptian border, those who are caught are jailed without charge for an arbitrary period; when Israel needs to make way for more prisoners, the asylum seekers are dumped in south Tel Aviv and other cities.For those bearing the scars of war, detention in Israel is traumatizing. Sunday Dieng, a 26-year-old asylum seeker, left his village in South Sudan when he was 10 years old after he saw his parents murdered by Sudanese forces. In Egypt, Dieng says, he faced racism and violence on the street. So, in 2006, he headed to Israel – only to spend his first 14 months behind bars.“To live in jail for one year and two months for no reason … it’s terrible, it’s very difficult,” Dieng says. “It causes some damage to the [mind], because you know you didn’t do anything wrong, you didn’t do any crime.” Although Dieng was an adult when he arrived, unaccompanied minors make up a significant part of Israel’s refugee population. And those children are also detained without charge.Once out of jail, the state either refuses to process refugees’ individual requests for asylum or arbitrarily rejects them without adequately investigating their claims. Instead, Israel gives citizens of Sudan and Eritrea group protection. So they get visas, but not work visas – forcing refugees onto the black market where they face exploitation.Many are unable to find jobs at all and, because they do not have citizenship or residency, they do not get help from the state. South Tel Aviv’s parks are filled with homeless, emaciated refugees. Others scrape by on odd jobs and live in crowded apartments; sometimes two dozen asylum seekers will share a single room.Their children, even those who are born here and speak fluent Hebrew, are not recognized by the state. Although they can attend municipal kindergartens and schools from the age of three, before then, their parents don’t get help paying for day-care as poor Israelis do. So they are forced to send their toddlers to cheaper, unregulated black market day-cares, places one NGO worker refers to as “storage of children”.Mimi Hylameshesh, a single mother from Eritrea, earns approximately 2,000 Israeli shekels (about 500 US dollars) a month working as a house cleaner. Her rent is 1,500 shekels; day-care for her toddler runs another 600 shekels. What about food?She shrugs and looks away, embarrassed. “It’s hard for me,” Hylameshesh says. But her child always eats.When Hylameshesh doesn’t have the money, she goes without–just like those 21 refugees who spent over a week on the border.

CHINA, FOXCONN: WORKERS DOING IT FOR THEMSELVES

To contact us Click HERE


Last weeks "riot" at a Foxconn  Taiyuan plant in China has drawn attention around the world.  Foxconn’s Taiyuan facility employs an astounding 79,000 employees and builds many of America's favorite tech gadgets, including Apple’s brand new iPhone 5.

The question is why did it happen and what does it mean.  Some have said the four hour brawl that resulted in forty hospitilizations was the result of tensions caused by a sudden influx of out of twon workers.  That could be part of the reason, I suppose, but since "out of town" workers are pretty common in China it is hard to imagine it is really the primary cause. 

 There is also a long standing history of tension between guards at the plants and the workers and the lack of any effective way for the workers grievances with the guards to be heard, let alone resolved. One 19-year-old worker who Reuters tracked down in hospital said security guards at the plant were rough and there is a culture of managers verbally abusing workers. ”It doesn’t matter who you are, you shouldn’t curse people like that,” the worker told Reuters. “They do it all the time. If it happens over a long time, it builds up and of course it makes people angry and they go crazy like that.”

It seems that it might be mentioned that Foxconn has faced server criticism over working conditions and wages for a long time now in china.  China Worker points out:

Foxconn has long been tainted by scandals especially since a spate of worker suicides at its massive Shenzhen plants that became world news in 2010. Since then the company has shifted much production to inland regions such as Shanxi, Sichuan and Hunan, where wages are lower and it has been courted by local governments. But new scandals have erupted including the coercion of student labour to work as Foxconn ‘interns’. A strike at one Foxconn plant in June led to the dismissal of all the workers involved. 

 A report by several Chinese and Taiwanese universities published last October showed that nearly 28 percent of Foxconn workers have been verbally insulted by supervisors or security personnel, and 16 percent have suffered physical abuse. “Workers aren’t allowed to talk, smile, sit down, walk around or move unnecessarily during their long working hours, which require them to finish 20,000 products every day,” this report stated.

I would also note that Wages make up just 2-5 percent of the iPhone’s sale price, while Apple’s profit is 57 percent of every iPhone sold. 


In fact a statement from China Labor Watch says:


Chinese media has reported that on the night of September 23, Foxconn’s Taiyuan factory erupted in a riot involving over 2000 workers that has led to the injury of 40 people. The initial trigger of the incident involves a conflict between some guards and a worker. The guards reportedly dragged the worker into a van and began beating him. This led to the involvement of other workers, quickly devolving into a large-scale group fight between workers and guards. By the end of the night, the guards had ran away.

But the roots causes of this incident demand attention. Foxconn factories, which produce many of Apple’s products, have a history of maintaining militaristic management practices as well as putting an inordinate amount of stress on workers. Coming from a variety of places throughout China, workers are required to work 10-hour day and night shifts with little rest, receiving low wages, and all the while suffering very strict factory rules on behavior and suffering the verbal and physical abuse of guards. Given such stress, the workers are on edge, and incidents like the one yesterday are more likely to occur. This is especially true of a time in which Apple has given Foxconn large orders for new products, like the iPhone 5.  

CLW doesn’t know the exact products manufactured by workers involved in this incident, but this Taiyuan factory is currently producing Apple’s iPhone 5’s. We can thus conclude that the pressure on workers at this factory must be greater than usual.

These workers must be treated with respect. And both Apple and Foxconn, with billions of dollars in profits every year, have both a legal and ethical obligation to uphold the rights of these workers.


When Apple puts in orders with Foxconn for the new iPhone, it never considers the human rights of the workers, nor the production capacity of its factories. Rather, it is only concerned with sales revenues, PR, customers----its own interests. Just as in the case of the riot taking place in Foxconn's Taiyuan factory, a large number of workers are transferred to the factory at one time to produce the new iPhone. This large influx combined with the militaristic management at the factory results in tremendous pressure on the workers, and this may have been a root cause of the conflict. This sort of circumstance is bound to lead to the eruption of certain issues in other factories of Foxconn sooner or later. 

Chinese workers like workers everywhere are exploited by global capital and as everywhere it is only the workers themselves who have the power and ability to put an end to that exploitation. We are not talking trade unions, or vanguard party  here.  We are talking worker self organization.  It is absolutely essential that the Chinese Communist Party recognize what this means and recognize that Marx was not kidding when  he said that the emancipation of the working class could be accomplished only by the working class itself.  The role of the Party is NOT to lead the class, not tell the class what to do, not become the State.  As an old comrade of mine, Noel Ignatiev wrote:


The task of revolutionaries is not to organize the workers but to organize themselves to discover those patterns of activity and forms of organization that have sprung up out of the struggle and that embody the new society, and to help them grow stronger, more confident, and more conscious of their direction.



 Wouldn't it be something if someday the Chinese Communist Party came to this understanding.

In the meantime, Chinese workers are a significant part of the world's multitude which sooner or later will change the world.  In fact, in some ways Chinese workers who have shown no hesitation in battling capital could be considered as amongst those at the forefront of a worldwide struggle for the emancipation of their class...and beyond.  

The following is from the World Socialist Web Site.

Thousands of Foxconn workers clash with security guards in China

By John Chan 

Taiwan-based Foxconn, the world’s largest outsourcing electronics manufacturer, had to suspend production at one of its major facilities, in the northern Chinese city of Taiyuan, on Monday following a protest during which 2,000 assembly line workers clashed with 1,500 security guards.
The unrest is another sign of the rising social tensions in China, where the economy is slowing sharply due to the deepening slump in the major Western markets, threatening to fuel major working class confrontations with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime.
There have been a growing number of strikes in China in line with emerging movements of the working class around the world, including the struggles by South African platinum miners, the strike by Chicago teachers and the ongoing protests opposing austerity by workers in Europe.
The Foxconn plant in Shanxi’s provincial capital has 79,000 workers. It is part of the supply chain that makes components for major international corporations, including for Apple’s new iPhone 5. Foxconn is the largest private employer in China, with 1.1 million workers, mostly young.
According to the British Telegraph, the unrest was sparked late on Sunday night after “a dispute between a worker and aggressive security guards in one of the factory dormitories spiralled out of control” and “thousands of workers streamed off their shifts and joined the fray against the plant’s 1,500 security guards.” The report noted witness accounts, posted on Internet blogging sites, that “grievances over pay and working conditions were also aired” and “the factory’s supermarket was also destroyed.”
About 10,000 onlookers then became involved in the confrontation, forcing authorities to deploy 5,000 police officers to quell the disturbance. The participants, mainly assembly line workers, smashed security posts, factory gates and vehicles, including police cars.
The police only managed to bring the situation under control at 9 a.m. on Monday. As of Monday, the plant remained shut, with 35 paramilitary police trucks parked outside. Riot police guarded the factory entrance, warning workers over loudspeakers that a “criminal incident” had occurred and urging them to respect the law.
Foxconn said 40 people were hospitalised, with “a number of people” arrested. A First Financial Daily journalist who was at the scene claimed that at least 10 people were killed, but officials have not confirmed the report.
The company claimed that the confrontation was “not work-related”. Likewise, the official Xinhua news agency and the police described the fight as nothing but a communal-style clash between employees from Shandong and Henan.
In fact, Foxconn’s security arm is notorious for abusive practices against workers, as part of the company’s military-style management. Online comments appeared on Chinese blogging sites suggesting that security guards beat up a worker who failed to present them with a pass to enter the dormitory, angering thousands of workers.
The Shanghai Evening Post recently sent one of its reporters undercover into the Taiyuan site, where he trained for seven days and then spent three days assembling the new iPhone’s metal back plates. In the dormitory section where the protest erupted, he wrote: “The whole dormitory smells like rubbish ... There was uncleared rubbish outside every room. Cockroaches crawled out from my wardrobe and the bed sheets are dirty with ash. All the windows are barred.”
Workers would be fired if they were found carrying any metallic objects. They had to sit still while working long hours. On the assembly line, they had to produce an iPhone 5 back plate almost every three seconds, and the reporter had to pick up each plate and mark four points, using an oil-based paint pen. “Every ten hours, I had to finish 3,000 back plates. After several hours, I had terrible neck pain,” he wrote.
Foxconn first came to international attention when 14 young workers jumped to their deaths in 2010 because of the unbearable conditions. In a public relations exercise, Foxconn then granted token pay rises, but shifted more production from coastal regions to inland provinces where labour is cheaper. The company’s contempt for workers remains unchanged. Earlier this year, Foxconn’s billionaire CEO Terry Gou likened his factories to a giant zoo, declaring that it was not easy to manage one million “animals”.
Like many outsourcing manufacturers, Foxconn is now expanding overseas. It has eight factories in Brazil, and its next major destination is Indonesia, where the average monthly wage is just one third of China’s. Far from giving concessions to Chinese workers, Foxconn is ramping up the pressure on them, on pain of losing their jobs.
As a result, strikes and unrest have rocked Foxconn’s plants since a threatened collective suicide by hundreds of workers at its Wuhan plant in January. In March and April, thousands of workers at the Taiyuan facility downed tools over the company’s failure to deliver a promised wage rise for entry-level workers, who are typically paid 1,550 yuan ($US245) a month. In June, a thousand workers at Foxconn’s Chengdu plant rioted against security guards.
Foxconn assembles 85 percent of iPhones, or more than 50 million sets a year. Earlier this year, following media reports exposing the company’s sweatshop conditions, Apple CEO Tim Cook toured Foxconn’s plants in China, professing concern for the workers who made his products. He said: “We care about every worker in our worldwide supply chain … Any suggestion that we don’t care is patently false and offensive to us.”
China’s vice premier Li Keqiang also feigned sympathy, asking Apple and other international corporations to be more “caring” to the millions of Chinese workers they exploited.
However, this posturing disappeared quickly, especially when the orders for the new iPhones arrived. In some places, authorities forced students into the Foxconn workforce in order to meet the targets. In Jiangsu province’s Huai’an city, several tertiary institutes compelled thousands of students to become Foxconn “interns” for two months, making parts for the iPhone 5. In Henan province, local governments even subsidised Foxconn’s payrolls to help it meet the production targets.
Foxconn and similar contract manufacturers throughout China and Asia are facing downward pressure on their profitability because of the worsening global economic crisis. Foxconn’s net profit margin fell to just 1.4 percent in the second quarter of this year—down from 1.5 percent in the first three months. Its first half-year profit rose by just 0.5 percent, with deep losses from its handset manufacturing business.
With China’s manufacturing contracting for 11 consecutive months, it is only a matter of time before far broader unrest erupts among the country’s multi-million working class.

MAPUCHE HUNGER STRIKE AND STRUGGLE CONTINUE IN CHILE

To contact us Click HERE


Representatives of the  Mapuche comminity in Santiago, chile are demanding the release of four prisoners jailed in Angol Chilean Araucania who have been on a hungar strike for weeks.  Nibaldo Huenuman, a Mapauce leader said, 

We hope the government listens to our demands, and find a solution to declare null the judgment of the brothers that remain in prison, which were unjustly accused and excessively severe sentenced.


Our community here in Santiago will continue protesting through avenues, partially to break the siege of communications about our case and try that citizens know that there are four Mapuche on hunger strike for nearly 30 days, unjustly convicted.

The hunger strike began on August 31 to protest the Chilean government's repression of the country's largest indigenous group.  The hunger strikers are protesting a lengthy prison sentence that two of the prisoners were given which  they call,  "discriminatory, racist and political."

Prensa Latina reports:


In addition to demanding the annulment of the sentences for Levipán and Levinao, the hunger strikers called for adherence by the Chilean government to International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169, which protects the rights of indigenous peoples; an end to the use of protected witnesses in Mapuche cases; an end to raids on Mapuche communities; and the release of all political prisoners and the return of indigenous lands to the communities.

Mapuche activists charge that that the government uses excessive force and unjust applications of criminal law to repress their actions, with which they seek the return of ancestral lands now being exploited by timber companies and other businesses.


Just yesterday the Chilean Supreme Court ordered an investigation into charges that police wounded three children and an adolescent when they assaulted Mapuche protesters "sitting in" at a hospital in the south of Chile.  At the time of the attack UNICEF issued a statement condemning the police action. 


Chile's national police, the Carabineros, are considered a branch of the armed forces, so the court ordered "the corresponding military judge to carry out an investigation" of the incident. The court ruling said,  "The rigor displayed by the police as they faced the group of people ... exceeded the framework of what is acceptable."
On the other hand, the same court rejected a request Monday from Mapuche communities in southern Chile for access to what they considered sacred land for ritual purposes. The communities also requested an end to the logging of trees in the area by private companies, which they considered to be illegal.  This overturned a lower court ruling.
The Santiago Times reports;
The Supreme Court decision was met with opposition from Mapuche leaders and human rights organization Observatorio Cuidadano who called the ruling a “setback” in indigenous relations with the state.


“The resolution ignores the existence of Ngen Mapu Kintuante when it says the land does not qualify as indigenous,” Mapuche Chief Juana Kuante said. “It upholds the law of private property without recognizing that our communities have traditionally used this ceremonial space.”


Kuante said the ruling does not respect Article 13 of the International Labor Organization’s (ILO) Convention 169, which states that governments should respect the “special importance for the cultures and spiritual values of the peoples concerned of their relationship with the lands or territories.”


The indigenous Mapuche tribe of south-central Chile has been actively seeking greater recognition of rights and the recovery of sacred lands since the 1990s following the return of democracy to the country.


Observatorio Cuidadano representatives argue the decision contradicts previous court rulings in favor of indigenous tribes in Chile and internationally. In the 2009 case of Francisca Machi Linconao Rahue, the Court of Appeals of Temuco in southern Chile prohibited a nearby forestry company from cutting down trees and shrubs within a 400-yard radius of sacred Mapuche springs. Another similar case was seen in 2008, when the Court of Appeals of Iquique in northern Chile granted the indigenous Aymara community of Chusmiza Usmagama access to sacred springs that were contested by the Chusmiza Mineral Water company.

The following is from Intercontinental Cry.


Mapuche activists enter fifth week of ‘open-ended’ hunger strike

By Nikki Salinas-Duda Sep 27, 2012 
Photo by Carolonline. Some rights reserved.
CHILE -- Five Mapuche activists are entering the fifth week of an “open-ended” hunger strike at Angol Detention Center in the country’s Araucanía region. Community member Daniel Levinao Montoya called the hunger strike after he and Paulino Levipan Coyán were convicted by a military court in mid-August. The men are protesting the militarization of their land in Chile’s south and calling for the release of all Mapuche political prisoners.
The two activists were arrested in connection to a November 2011 shooting in Chequenco that left three members of the national police wounded. The court ruled the shooting was predetermined and sentenced both to 10 years for attempted murder, along with another year-and-a-half for possession of firearms. Levinao and Levipan, whose attorney plans to appeal the convictions, are both in their late teens.
In their fifth message to supporters, the strikers include a chart of their weights before the strike and two weeks in. According to Prensa Latina, community leader Nibaldo Huenuman’s statements to the site indicated the young men “suffer physical deterioration, have lost about 10 kilograms … and can barely stand up.” Despite significant weight-loss and general poor health, the men remain steadfast in their commitment to the strike and have refused hospital treatment.
The action is the third hunger strike to be carried out by Mapuche activists in three years, following two strikes in the summer of 2010 and spring 2011. Current strikers have not received the same level of media attention as those in years past, but all three actions have targeted a common enemy: Pinochet-era anti-terrorist legislation that is used almost exclusively against Mapuche community members.
An incident in April left police sergeant Hugo Albornoz fatally wounded. Albornoz’s injuries were sustained during a firefight that began after police raided Wente Winkul Mapu. According to witnesses, police were searching for evidence related to an October 2011 attack on a nearby private estate. Two months after Albornoz’s death, Erick Montoya Montoya was beaten and sustained buckshot wounds before police arrested him in connection to the crime. At least five members of Montoya Montoya’s family were also assaulted by police; the victims ranged in age from 12 to 78-years-old.
The remaining strikers –  Rodrigo Montoya Melinao and Héctor Ricardo Nahuelqueo Nahuelqueo – were arrested on charges related to the April attack. Montoya Montoya and Montoya Melinao await trial in Angol while Nahuelqueo, 19, was released on parole.
While their comrades count the hours until their own days in court, both Levipan and Levinaowere tried under the anti-terrorist law, known as Chile’s Law No. 19.027. A hangover from the country’s 17-year military dictatorship, the law makes it possible for civilians to be tried in military courts and, in the event that they are not convicted, may be subject to double jeopardy in a civilian hearing.
No. 19.027’s power stems from its adaptability. The legislation redefines “terrorism” to include property violence or attacks on corporate employees and allows for the use of anonymous witnesses to convict suspected terrorists. Until recently, anonymous witnesses were not allowed to be cross-examined by the defense.
Mapuche community members argue the law and its provisions usurp due process and criminalize the group’s struggle. Daniel Melinao, a spokesperson for Wente Winkul Mapu,argued in a speech at a Mapuche Ceremonial Center in Viña del Mar that the sentences were discriminatory and racist. "It was police who testified before the judges and they did not show any paper, antecedents or medical paper showing that they had even a scratch, pellet wound or whatever,” Melinao told the crowd.
But in spite of police violence and shady trial proceedings, the Mapuche struggle is still a polarizing topic for many Chileans. Social media buzzed with news of the strike and marked two distinct sides of the debate. Some argued the Mapuche and their supporters operate on the assumption that Mapuche lives should be protected at the expense of the lives of others. To make distinctions, one man tweeted, is to “distort the value of human life.”
At least four people have died in what the Chilean government has dubbed the Mapuche Conflict – three Mapuche and one national policeman. Some sources cite a higher figure. Only one of those suspected of killing the Mapuche victims was tried and the court did not convict the alleged assassin.
*
Resistance to repression has a centuries’ long history in Mapuche communities. The Mapuche staved off incorporation into the Inka Empire and their lands constituted the southern border of Inka territory.
European would-be colonizers met a similar fate. The Spaniards were only able to extend the colonial project as far south as the Bío-Bío River after a protracted battle with the Mapuche. The indigenous territory south of the River was one of the last pieces of South America to be incorporated into a modern nation-state in the 1880s, when Chilean forces finally began colonizing the region a full 60 years after declaring independence from Spain.
Free from the repression of Pinochet’s military since Chile’s return to democracy in 1990, activists began to engage in increasingly radical actions in the struggles for freedom of speech and affordable education.
Mapuche militants are no different in this respect. Legal land occupations and apolitical cultural centers were cast aside in favor of forceful land reclamations, anti-police actions and anti-corporate violence. Uprooting industrial crops and replacing them with foodstuffs became common practice in some communities in an effort to reclaim ancestral Mapuche lands fromprivate and corporate interests.
And while the Mapuche focus on local issues, radical Chilean student movements areaddressing Mapuche issues and incorporating the Mapuche struggle into their battle with the Sebastián Piñera administration. In its manifesto, the student movement demanded an increase in scholarships for indigenous students and the inclusion of course content relative to indigenous languages and histories.
At the 39 anniversary memorials of the 1973 military coup that ousted the democratically elected Salvador Allende, marchers called for freedom and justice for the Mapuche, marking a shift in the way indigenous identity is imagined from an urban perspective. The Mapuche are a powerful piece of urban Chilean national identity and imagination, and after a mass migration from the south to cities like Santiago, a tangible part. Over half of all people who self-identify as Mapuche live in urban settings (44% in Santiago alone), while more still have Mapuche lineage.
In rural indigenous communities, support came in the form of solidarity strikes. Mapuche activists expressed unity with the five incarcerated youths and began a hunger strike on August 25, after 30 days of occupying UNICEF’s Santiago office. According to TeleSur, the occupiers were occupying to protest the “passivity” and “lack of support” for Mapuche youth targeted by the government’s violence and criminalization of the struggle. Organizers suspended the strikeafter UNICEF representative Tom Olsen agreed to meet with the occupiers.
Amidst the shows of support from around Chile, the young hunger strikers announced their ownlist of demands. The Aug. 29 communiqué from Angol asks for the annulment of the sentences of both Levipan and Levinao and freedom for all Mapuche political prisoners; the demilitarization of Mapuche territory; an end to the use of protected witnesses in Mapuche cases and the return of land to indigenous communities.
In a fifth dispatch released September 12, the young men wrote, “being in prison is like being dead” and asked supporters to tell their parents: “we struggle because we were born Mapuche.”